Manufacturer: AMD Price: $ 109/$159 US Author: Steve Date: 02/14/2012

[ Benchmarks: Crysis 2, Crysis Warhead ]

When testing with Crysis 2 at 1680x1050 the Radeon HD 7770 averaged 65fps, making it 7% faster than the HD 6790, 35% faster than the old HD 6770 and 23% faster than the GeForce GTX 550 Ti. That said it was disappointingly 20% slower than the GeForce GTX 560. The Radeon HD 7750 on the other hand averaged 54fps, making it just 2% faster than the GeForce GTX 550 Ti, while it was still 13% faster than the old HD 6770 and 23% faster than the HD 6750. The Radeon HD 7770 averaged 57fps when testing with Crysis Warhead at 1680x1050 which is the same average frame rate produced by the GeForce GTX 460, making it 17% slower than the GeForce GTX 560. That said it was 6% faster than the Radeon HD 6790, 21% faster than the HD 6770 and 24% faster than the GeForce GTX 550 Ti. Meanwhile the Radeon HD 7750 spat out 42fps, making it 9% slower than the GeForce GTX 550 Ti and 11% slower than the HD 6770. Despite that it was still 5% faster than the old Radeon HD 6750.

<- Previous Page Table of Contents Introduction Test System Specs & 3Dmark 11 >>> Benchmarks: Crysis 2, Crysis Warhead <<< Benchmarks: Civilization V, Just Cause 2 Benchmarks: Splinter Cell, World in Conflict Power Consumption & Temperatures Conclusion Next Page ->

skully

Posted on: 02/15/2012 08:09 PM Disappointing performance for those prices for sure.

razr	Posted on: 02/15/2012 08:17 PM Looking like I am still not going to bother upgrading my 5770 Crossfire setup

Offordef

Posted on: 02/15/2012 09:03 PM AMD you are ripping us off, nVidia give us some competition please. Such a small chip can't be expensive to produce an certainly not worth what the consumer is charged for. 4770 -> 5770 -> 6770 -> 7770...... Looking for a GPU for my Mini-ITX HTPC but probably stick with a 6850 (I have the space and PSU). For this price I expect something that can play Full HD (Games ) with more frames then this offers. Too bad because I do like the power envelope of this thing. (Steve, thanks for the review)

ProX	Posted on: 02/15/2012 09:43 PM I agree massive rip off. How can AMD release a product that is so much slower than the competition and charge pretty much the same price. As the review said the GTX 560 is like 9 months old now and still much faster. Shame on you AMD!

lydown

Posted on: 02/16/2012 08:45 AM yeah AMD pretty much sucks now.