heading
Welcome
. . ......
Latest Content
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom...
QNAP TS-879 Pro (10GbE Performance...
Intel Core i7-3770K (Ivy Bridge)...
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 6...
HIS Radeon HD 7870 IceQ Turbo...
Asrock X79 Extreme4 & X79 Extreme4...
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7870 OC...
OCZ Octane 512GB
AMD Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon HD 7...
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7770 OC...
TechSpot Reviews
Testing 10 Gigabit Ethernet Perfo...
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom ...
Cubitek HPTX-ICE Case Review...
Raspberry Pi Review & Initial How...
Biggest Tech Failures of The Last...
Gainward GeForce GTX 680 Phantom ...
Cloud Storage: 5 Alternatives, Wh...
Tribes: Ascend GPU & CPU Performa...
Ivy Bridge Debuts: Intel Core i7-...
TechSpot PC Buying Guide...
Latest News
Comcast investigated over net neu...
Sony VAIO S, VAIO Z get Ivy Bridg...
Netgear adds cheaper router, USB ...
DDoS attack sidelines The Pirate ...
Samsung tops mobile sales, Window...
Microsoft improves multi-monitor ...
Aaron Sorkin confirmed to write s...
Japanese scientists develop 20x f...
Amazon source reveals plan to lau...
HTC One X, EVO 4G LTE held by US ...

Manufacturer: Crucial
Price: $ 330 US
Author: Steve
Date: 08/03/2009

[ Performance Degradation Testing ]

Here we are going to see just how much performance you can expect to lose from each SSD over time. First we test the SSD’s in their clean unused state, and then we run the HD Tach full benchmark several times, which fills the entire drive. This simulates heavy usage and gives us a clear indication of how the performance will be affected once the SSD is in use.

As you can see, little changed when measuring the sequential performance of each SSD. However the Corsair P Series did drop quite a lot of performance when measuring write performance. It was the 4KB testing where we saw the biggest drop offs. The Intel X25-M took a massive performance hit, while the Indilinx Barefoot SSDs dropped around 5MB/s.

<- Previous Page
Next Page ->