heading
Welcome
. . ......
Latest Content
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom...
QNAP TS-879 Pro (10GbE Performance...
Intel Core i7-3770K (Ivy Bridge)...
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 6...
HIS Radeon HD 7870 IceQ Turbo...
Asrock X79 Extreme4 & X79 Extreme4...
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7870 OC...
OCZ Octane 512GB
AMD Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon HD 7...
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7770 OC...
TechSpot Reviews
Testing 10 Gigabit Ethernet Perfo...
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom ...
Cubitek HPTX-ICE Case Review...
Raspberry Pi Review & Initial How...
Biggest Tech Failures of The Last...
Gainward GeForce GTX 680 Phantom ...
Cloud Storage: 5 Alternatives, Wh...
Tribes: Ascend GPU & CPU Performa...
Ivy Bridge Debuts: Intel Core i7-...
TechSpot PC Buying Guide...
Latest News
Comcast investigated over net neu...
Sony VAIO S, VAIO Z get Ivy Bridg...
Netgear adds cheaper router, USB ...
DDoS attack sidelines The Pirate ...
Samsung tops mobile sales, Window...
Microsoft improves multi-monitor ...
Aaron Sorkin confirmed to write s...
Japanese scientists develop 20x f...
Amazon source reveals plan to lau...
HTC One X, EVO 4G LTE held by US ...

Manufacturer: Gigabyte
Price: $ 230 US
Author: Steve
Date: 08/10/2010

[ GeForce GTX 460 in Detail ]

Based on the Fermi third-generation Streaming Multiprocessor (SM) architecture, the GeForce GTX 460 boasts 336 CUDA cores, which is almost twice the shader power of the GT200 architecture used by the GeForce GTX 260. Interestingly this means that the GeForce GTX 460 has just 4.5% fewer cores when compared to the GTX 465.

What’s more interesting is the fact that the GeForce GTX 460 has the same number of TMUs (Texture Mapping Units) as the GeForce GTX 470, with 56 in total, which is 27% more than the GeForce GTX 465. The GeForce GTX 460 (768MB) version features 24 ROPs (Raster Operations Pipelines), while the 1024MB versions will carry 32 like the GeForce GTX 465.

The graphics clock speed for fixed function units is 675MHz, while the CUDA Cores operate at a more aggressive 1350MHz. This means that the fixed function units and CUDA Cores are clocked 11% higher on the GeForce GTX 460 than they are on the GTX 465 and GTX 470 graphics cards.

There are two versions of the GeForce GTX 460, one teamed with 1024MB of GDDR5 memory and a smaller cheaper version with just 768MB of GDDR5 memory. Both are clocked at 900MHz (3600MHz DDR). While they both share the same operating frequency, the 768MB cards only feature a 192-bit wide memory bus, while the larger 1024MB cards get a bigger 256-bit bus.

This means that while the 1024MB cards will have a peak memory bandwidth of 115.2GB/s, the smaller 768MB cards are limited to 86.4GB/s, a 25% bandwidth reduction. It is interesting to note that the larger 1024MB version of the GeForce GTX 460 will actually have 12% more bandwidth at its disposal when compared to the more expensive GeForce GTX 465.

Unlike the GeForce GTX 465, the Thermal Design Power (TDP) rating of the GeForce GTX 460 is very reasonable, with the 1024MB version rated at 160 watts and the 768MB version 150 watts. This makes the 1024MB cards 20% more fuel efficient when compared to the GeForce GTX 465 and 9% more efficient when compared to the Radeon HD 5830.

Other than the PCI Express slot, the GeForce GTX 460 draws in power through a pair of external PCI Express power connectors. The GTX 460 requires dual 6-pin connectors, which is the same configuration used by the Radeon HD 5830. The GeForce GTX 460 also features a single SLI bridge connector allowing it to be paired with another graphics card.

<- Previous Page
Next Page ->
FootSoldier



Posted on: 08/11/2010 12:46 PM
I got a pair of these in SLI and they are faster than my friends GTX 480 and they cost less. Very pleased!!!

corky



Posted on: 08/11/2010 01:02 PM
That's a good looking card with a nice price tag. I was thinking of pulling the trigger on one of these and the review has made it all the more tempting, thanks :S

cisco



Posted on: 08/12/2010 01:44 AM
man these things overclock well. are there any versions that allow voltage mods?

boomslang



Posted on: 08/15/2010 01:06 PM
nice review. this card looks the goods.

razor9



Posted on: 08/15/2010 11:43 PM
I like how they have used dual fans. The load temps are really low.

userdude



Posted on: 08/21/2010 05:23 PM
Would this card overclock better ,with a superior thermal compound ?

ProX



Posted on: 08/22/2010 10:32 PM
Very cool looking card for the money.

@ userdude - Maybe but it ran pretty cool as it was. Chances are they got an average overclocking card. What would really improve overclocking is a voltage mod :D

Mr.November



Posted on: 09/08/2010 11:15 PM
When I use your overclocking numbers I get a Driver error when running 3D Mark Vantage? So I'm back on 800/1600/1900 Please tell me what I'm doing wrong? Already have the latest drivers...

Lee



Posted on: 09/14/2010 09:42 AM
This looks much more impressive than those new GTS 450 cards. So whats your take, the 768MB of 1024MB version?

Ryoga



Posted on: 12/17/2010 06:51 PM
Hey everyone. Anyone know of problems with these cards because newegg has a lot of spammers saying these cards are horrible and only last for a few weeks then crap out? Please post. :)

Whippit



Posted on: 12/21/2010 05:29 AM
Ryoga thats BS I have had one for months now and I game almost every day with it. Great card for the money and it still is!