heading
Welcome
. . ......
Latest Content
Asustor AS-606T
AMD Radeon HD 7990
Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ...
Infortrend EonNAS Pro 510...
HIS Radeon HD 7790 iCooler Turbo 1...
QNAP TS-469L
Gigabyte GeForce GTX Titan...
HIS Radeon HD 7850 iPower IceQ Tur...
Thecus N5550
Synology DiskStation DS713+ and DX...
TechSpot Reviews
Metro: Last Light Performance, Be...
Building a Thin Mini-ITX PC: Smal...
Metro: Last Light Review...
TechSpot PC Buying Guide...
Gigabyte U2442F Ultrabook Review...
8 Free to Play Games That Are Too...
Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon Review...
Samsung Galaxy S 4 Review...
AMD Radeon HD 7990 Review...
Sapphire Edge VS8 Mini PC Review...
Latest News
Next iPad rumored to be 33% light...
Spotify launches free-to-play top...
Leap Motion shows off gesture con...
Microsoft officially announces Xb...
Watch Microsoft's next-generation...
Google Checkout may be dead, but ...
Yahoo redesigns Flickr, adds 1 te...
AT&T to enable all pre-loaded vid...
Apple's retail stores reach new r...
Apple's retail stores reach new r...

Manufacturer: Intel
Price: $ N/A US
Author: Steve
Date: 07/13/2006

[ Synthetic Benchmarks ]

The SiSoft2007 synthetic processor results are quite interesting. Already we have seen the synthetic benchmark programs tell us that these new Intel processors are much faster in 3D environments (3Dmark2003). Then we learnt that they offer memory performance comparable to that of a Pentium 4 660. Now we find that SiSoft2007 suggests that the ALU performance is only 10% greater on the Core 2 Duo E6700!
I believe this is where the majority of the performance increase is coming from and it can be seen in the SiSoft2007 multimedia performance test. Here the Core 2 Duo E6700 is an incredible 65% faster in the Floating-Point test than Intels previous dual-core king the Pentium D 950. The much more expensive Core 2 Extreme X6800 processor was just 8% faster than the Core 2 Duo E6700.
Super PI performance is based on time, the quicker the processor makes the calculations the quicker it finishes this test. As you can see, the current desktop processors at their standard frequencies all take around 36 seconds to complete the 1MB calculation. Overclocking any one of these three processors so that they would break the 30 second barrier would be a reasonably tough job. Therefore, to simply plug the Intel Core 2 Duo in to see a 19 second 1MB calculation result was spectacular. The Core 2 Extreme was even better, making the same calculation in just 17 seconds!
This PCmark2005 CPU test looks at file decryption and encryption performance and here the AMD Athlon64 loses out badly. However, the new Intel processors are not really able to gain any ground over the current Pentium 4 660 and D950 processors.

<- Previous Page
Next Page ->