 |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||
 When testing with Hand Brake we saw a 16% performance increase favoring the Core i7-3770K over the i7-2600K. This meant that the Core i7-3770K was faster than the i7-3820 and FX-8150 processors, while it was still 13% slower than the mighty i7-3960X.
 The Core i7-3770K performed well in the x264 HD Benchmark as it was 17% faster than the i7-2600K in the first pass test and 27% faster than the FX-8150. More over this impressive performance gain over the Core i7-2600K meant that the i7-3770K was just 1% slower than the i7-3960X.
 The TMPGEnc 4.0 XPress test saw the Core i7-3770K complete the task 35 seconds before the i7-2600K making it 9% faster. This placed the Core i7-3770K between the i7-3820 and i7-3960X, which is an impressive result. |
|||||
|
|
Calle2003 Posts: 16 Joined: 2010-04-27 |
Posted on: 04/23/2012 09:40 PM
What kind of cooling did you use to be able to run 1.520v on an Ivy Bridge? It would be interesting to see some temperature readings as well.  |
|
ProX |
Posted on: 04/24/2012 11:22 AM
Nice update but nothing majorly new. |
|
Snoop |
Posted on: 04/24/2012 11:52 PM
I was just getting ready to upgrade from my core i5 750 system so this is prefect timing. Thanks for the review. |
|
Produkt |
Posted on: 04/28/2012 08:30 AM
Would really like to see the temps and cooling method used to sustain a 1.520v on the Ivy Bridge architecture. With such a small die size to dissipate heat, I can only imagine TERRIBLE temperatures. Reports of 90+ degrees Celsius are streaming in from mere 1.4v overclocks. I would imagine due to the parabolic temperature to voltage ratio, the core must have gotten red-hot unless cooled with liquid hydrogen/nitrogen. |