heading
Welcome
. . ......
Latest Content
AMD A4-5000 - Kabini the mainstrea...
Asustor AS-606T
AMD Radeon HD 7990
Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ...
Infortrend EonNAS Pro 510...
HIS Radeon HD 7790 iCooler Turbo 1...
QNAP TS-469L
Gigabyte GeForce GTX Titan...
HIS Radeon HD 7850 iPower IceQ Tur...
Thecus N5550
TechSpot Reviews
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Review...
OCZ Vertex 450 SSD Review...
Xbox One: Entertainment Hub First...
Xbox One: Entertainment Hub First...
Metro: Last Light Performance, Be...
Building a Thin Mini-ITX PC: Smal...
Metro: Last Light Review...
TechSpot PC Buying Guide...
Gigabyte U2442F Ultrabook Review...
8 Free to Play Games That Are Too...
Latest News
Mozilla brings near-native applic...
Google visits the Galapagos Islan...
HP Envy/Pavilion revamp, more tou...
Microsoft unveils two new mice fo...
Apple claims Samsung violates Sir...
Yahoo acquires cross-platform gam...
Kim Dotcom holds two-factor authe...
Amazon Kindle Fire HD now availab...
Mailbox for iOS redesigned as nat...
Lenovo sees huge increase in PC s...

Manufacturer: Intel
Price: $ N/A US
Author: Steve
Date: 04/20/2012

[ On-die GPU Performance ]

Despite the various improvements the Intel HD4000 graphics solution found, the Core i7-3770K processor is still very underwhelming. The Core i7-2600K cannot be used for comparison in 3Dmark 11 as it does not support the required DirectX 11. With a score of 1486pts the Core i7-3770K was almost 20% slower than the AMD A8-3850, and 23% slower than a GeForce GT 430 graphics card.

The Core i7-3770K provided a 77% performance increase at 1280x800 in Splinter Cell Conviction when compared to the i7-2600K. This is an impressive performance gain, though it still meant that the Core i7-3770K was almost 40% slower than the AMD A8-3850.

When testing with Crysis Warhead the Core i7-3770K was 133% faster than the i7-2600K, yet despite this was still 22% slower than the AMD A8-3850.

This time when testing with Just Cause 2 we found that the Core i7-3770K was just 25% or 3fps faster than the Core i7-2600K. That meant that when compared to the AMD A8-3850 the Core i7-3770K was 48% slower.

This time the Core i7-3770K was 27% faster than the i7-2600K, though once again it was much slower than the AMD A8-3850 as it provided 24% less performance.

The Core i7-3770K provided a 64% performance boost over the i7-2600K in Civilization V with an average of 23fps. Though when compared to the 36fps of the AMD A8-3850 the Core i7-3770K was 36% slower.

<- Previous Page
Next Page ->
Calle2003


Posts: 16
Joined: 2010-04-27

Posted on: 04/23/2012 09:40 PM
What kind of cooling did you use to be able to run 1.520v on an Ivy Bridge? It would be interesting to see some temperature readings as well. :)

ProX



Posted on: 04/24/2012 11:22 AM
Nice update but nothing majorly new.

Snoop



Posted on: 04/24/2012 11:52 PM
I was just getting ready to upgrade from my core i5 750 system so this is prefect timing. Thanks for the review.

Produkt



Posted on: 04/28/2012 08:30 AM
Would really like to see the temps and cooling method used to sustain a 1.520v on the Ivy Bridge architecture.
With such a small die size to dissipate heat, I can only imagine TERRIBLE temperatures. Reports of 90+ degrees Celsius are streaming in from mere 1.4v overclocks.
I would imagine due to the parabolic temperature to voltage ratio, the core must have gotten red-hot unless cooled with liquid hydrogen/nitrogen.