heading
Welcome
. . ......
Latest Content
Asustor AS-606T
AMD Radeon HD 7990
Gainward GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ...
Infortrend EonNAS Pro 510...
HIS Radeon HD 7790 iCooler Turbo 1...
QNAP TS-469L
Gigabyte GeForce GTX Titan...
HIS Radeon HD 7850 iPower IceQ Tur...
Thecus N5550
Synology DiskStation DS713+ and DX...
TechSpot Reviews
Metro: Last Light Review...
TechSpot PC Buying Guide...
Gigabyte U2442F Ultrabook Review...
8 Free to Play Games That Are Too...
Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon Review...
Samsung Galaxy S 4 Review...
AMD Radeon HD 7990 Review...
Sapphire Edge VS8 Mini PC Review...
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost & SLI Pe...
LG Lucid 2 Smartphone Review...
Latest News
Weekend Open Forum: Imagining Goo...
Google strips 8.8 million lines o...
Asus' new lineup of Z87 Haswell m...
Congress pressures Google on Glas...
Newegg scores new victory against...
Intel CEO passed on the opportuni...
CW to launch Apple TV's first net...
Razer brings the arcade experienc...
Gamers spend more money on iOS th...
Bill Gates is once again the rich...

Manufacturer: Kingston
Price: $ 125 US
Author: Steve
Date: 04/10/2012

[ CrystalDiskMark ]


As you can see, with a sequential read speed of 259.6MB/s the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 64GB was actually faster than the claimed 225MB/s. The same goes for the sequential write performance which reached 161.4MB/s, smashing the claimed 135MB/s. Although the DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 was much faster than the Patriot Supersonic Magnum 128GB in these synthetic sequential tests, we found that in real-world situations this is not the case.


When measuring the random 512K performance we found that the read speed of the Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 64GB was exceptional. However the write performance on the other hand was quite weak, though this appears typical for flash based thumb drives.


Finally the random 4K-QD32 test and here we find that the read performance of the DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 is again very good. However the write performance was very poor as the DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 was much slower than the old DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0.

<- Previous Page
Next Page ->