heading
Welcome
. . ......
Latest Content
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom...
QNAP TS-879 Pro (10GbE Performance...
Intel Core i7-3770K (Ivy Bridge)...
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 6...
HIS Radeon HD 7870 IceQ Turbo...
Asrock X79 Extreme4 & X79 Extreme4...
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7870 OC...
OCZ Octane 512GB
AMD Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon HD 7...
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7770 OC...
TechSpot Reviews
Testing 10 Gigabit Ethernet Perfo...
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom ...
Cubitek HPTX-ICE Case Review...
Raspberry Pi Review & Initial How...
Biggest Tech Failures of The Last...
Gainward GeForce GTX 680 Phantom ...
Cloud Storage: 5 Alternatives, Wh...
Tribes: Ascend GPU & CPU Performa...
Ivy Bridge Debuts: Intel Core i7-...
TechSpot PC Buying Guide...
Latest News
Comcast investigated over net neu...
Sony VAIO S, VAIO Z get Ivy Bridg...
Netgear adds cheaper router, USB ...
DDoS attack sidelines The Pirate ...
Samsung tops mobile sales, Window...
Microsoft improves multi-monitor ...
Aaron Sorkin confirmed to write s...
Japanese scientists develop 20x f...
Amazon source reveals plan to lau...
HTC One X, EVO 4G LTE held by US ...

Manufacturer: N/A
Price: $ N/A US
Author: Steve
Date: 08/17/2010

[ Visual Quality Comparison ]




<- Previous Page
Next Page ->
corky



Posted on: 08/18/2010 11:28 PM
Interesting looking game. Thanks for testing so many cards.

tiger



Posted on: 08/19/2010 03:04 PM
Thank for the great review. I'm somewhat shocked to see such a performance loss going from dx9 to dx11. Personally I'm still using an dx9 XP pro system and with this results I'm seriously disencouraged to change soon to win7 and dx11. Personally I don't see that much difference in the dx11 pics.

I feel somewhat like dx11 and win7 are still a big rip off to invest heavy in pricy hardware.

Robbo



Posted on: 08/19/2010 09:42 PM
I downloaded the benchmark from GamersHell and you are right DX11 does very little to the image quality in the first test. Which is strange because the performance hit on my GeForce GTX 470 is massive :(

Josh



Posted on: 08/21/2010 07:59 AM
I ran this same benchmark on my setup:
CPU Intel Core i7 930 @ Stock Speed
Motherboard: EVGA X58 SLI LE
RAM 6Gb Geil Black Dragon DDR3 1600MHz (@1600MHz)
Windows 7 64 Bit Ultimate
VideoCards: EVGA Geforce GTX 470 SC & Geforce GT240 SC (For CUDA & PhysX)

When I set the GT240 as the only card for CUDA Processing in the NVIDIA Control Panel I wound up with higher FPS in DirectX 11 then you did at 1920x1200 (Was getting 58.6)

It might be worth adding in a dedicated card for CUDA processing and testing. Since this title does use Direct Compute.


Initial D



Posted on: 08/24/2010 02:29 AM
The first version was a bit of fun so I might give this a try as well when it comes out in October. Thanks for the results.

Offordef



Posted on: 08/25/2010 11:22 AM
Hi Steve,

Wondering how this scales on Multi Cores.
The original Lost planet was one of the first games that scaled well with more cores.
Maybe you could check this?
And thanks for the test, always worth checking your results.

Steve



Posts: 76
Joined: 2010-02-08

Posted on: 08/25/2010 01:43 PM
Thanks for the feedback guys.

@ Offordef - This is something I do want to test but I will wait till the game is released before I do it. Since this benchmark is designed to just test the GPU we are not sure how well it will test the games multi-core performance.

stevephillips79


Posts: 2
Joined: 2010-08-27

Posted on: 08/27/2010 06:02 AM
hi,
it's interesting game i'm still using an XP pro system and with results and lost planet was one of the first games that scaled well with more cores.thanks for sharing.

Hellx



Posted on: 09/04/2010 02:46 PM
Btw the game dnot support SLI ring its like dnot have 2nd card

ProX



Posted on: 09/04/2010 11:14 PM
@ Hellx - yes the article said SLI is not working yet which is not at all surprising. I am sure next month when it is released SLI will be working then or soon after.