The real-world performance of the S511 240GB was impressive as the drive performed well in both our file copy and application tests. The only weakness found was when running the CrystalDiskMark random 4K-QD32 test, where the read performance was considerably lower than the OCZ Vertex 3 240GB and Kingston HyperX 240GB drives.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
« QNAP TS-119P II and TS-219P II · ADATA S511 240GB
· Intel Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition »
|
Calle2003 Posts: 16 Joined: 2010-04-27 |
Posted on: 12/06/2011 10:02 PM
Great review but why didn't you include the Kingston SSDNow V100 256GB in the graphs which you have reviewed here: http://www.legionhardware.com/articles_pages/kingston_ssdnow_v_100_256gb_and_ssdnow_v_100_256gb,6.html |
|
Steve Posts: 80 Joined: 2010-02-08 |
Posted on: 12/08/2011 08:55 PM
Thanks for the feedback. The V100+ is there, I didn’t see the need to clutter the graphs with a similar product. The V100 is also a budget drive so it is less important to compare it with a SandForce SF-2281 drive. |