The Radeon HD 7750 for example might be 18% faster than the old Radeon HD 6750 (which is really just the HD 5750 that was released back in 2009), and at roughly the same price might seem like a good deal, but the HD 7750 is still slower than the GeForce GTX 550 Ti by an average of about 2%.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
« Sandy Bridge-E Memory Performance Guide · AMD Radeon HD 7770 & 7750
· Gigabyte Radeon HD 7770 OC »
|
skully |
Posted on: 02/15/2012 08:09 PM
Disappointing performance for those prices for sure. |
|
razr |
Posted on: 02/15/2012 08:17 PM
Looking like I am still not going to bother upgrading my 5770 Crossfire setup  |
|
Offordef |
Posted on: 02/15/2012 09:03 PM
AMD you are ripping us off, nVidia give us some competition please. Such a small chip can't be expensive to produce an certainly not worth what the consumer is charged for. 4770 -> 5770 -> 6770 -> 7770...... Looking for a GPU for my Mini-ITX HTPC but probably stick with a 6850 (I have the space and PSU). For this price I expect something that can play Full HD (Games ) with more frames then this offers. Too bad because I do like the power envelope of this thing. (Steve, thanks for the review) |
|
ProX |
Posted on: 02/15/2012 09:43 PM
I agree massive rip off. How can AMD release a product that is so much slower than the competition and charge pretty much the same price. As the review said the GTX 560 is like 9 months old now and still much faster. Shame on you AMD! |
|
lydown |
Posted on: 02/16/2012 08:45 AM
yeah AMD pretty much sucks now. |