heading
Welcome
. . ......
Latest Content
HIS Radeon HD 7950 IceQ Turbo...
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom...
QNAP TS-879 Pro (10GbE Performance...
Intel Core i7-3770K (Ivy Bridge)...
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 6...
HIS Radeon HD 7870 IceQ Turbo...
Asrock X79 Extreme4 & X79 Extreme4...
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7870 OC...
OCZ Octane 512GB
AMD Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon HD 7...
TechSpot Reviews
Diablo III Performance Test: Grap...
Testing 10 Gigabit Ethernet Perfo...
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom ...
Cubitek HPTX-ICE Case Review...
Raspberry Pi Review & Initial How...
Biggest Tech Failures of The Last...
Gainward GeForce GTX 680 Phantom ...
Cloud Storage: 5 Alternatives, Wh...
Tribes: Ascend GPU & CPU Performa...
Ivy Bridge Debuts: Intel Core i7-...
Latest News
Weekend tech reading: Facebook fr...
WOF: Windows 8 ditches Aero Glass...
Weekend Open Forum: Windows 8 dit...
Windows Phone claims 7% market sh...
Apple responds to 'deceptive ads'...
VIA unveils ultra-compact, fanles...
Weekend game deals: Deus Ex: HR $...
RIM, Motorola aim to meet Apple h...
Intel sets timeline to develop wo...
Apple fires back at Greenpeace: W...
Legion Hardware » Articles » Clock for Clock: Core i5, Core i7, Core 2 Quad and Phenom II X4 Performance

Clock for Clock: Core i5, Core i7, Core 2 Quad and Phenom II X4 Performance
[Posted by: Steve]
Read More
Comment
For something a little different today we are taking four quad-core series and comparing how they performance when operating at the same frequency. This clock for clock article features the Phenom II X4, Core 2 Quad, Core i7 and the new Core i5 series. Not only will we be comparing them at 2.80GHz but also at 3.60GHz to give overclockers an idea of what they can expect...

The most surprising match up was between the Core i5 750 and Core i7 860, which I mentioned was our original intention for this article. When clocked at the same frequency there is little difference between these two processors, and when pushing them as high as 3.60GHz there really is no difference. Of course the only difference between the two is the Hyper-Threading support of the Core i7 860, which really failed to help it in the majority of our tests.

09/12/2009
« A-DATA XPG X Series DDR3-1600X 6GB · Clock for Clock: Core i5, Core i7, Core 2 Quad and Phenom II X4 Performance · ATI Radeon HD 5870 »

krzemo



Posted on: 04/20/2010 02:30 PM
Good job! very interesting and useful comparison.

nazuzed



Posted on: 09/13/2010 09:19 PM
Q6600 with budget DDR2, gives at 9 x 400 Mhz ( 3,6 Ghz ), 61,6 latency and 8244 MB/s memory read performance ( Everest ) on a X48 ( P5E - Deluxe ) motherboard.......So, this article gives a falls perception on the Q6600 capabilities after OC.

Post New Comment

Your Name:


Icon:
Note  Alert  Question  Star  Idea  Disk  Smile  Wink  Sad  Mad  Happy 
Tongue  Sleep  Cool  Very Sad  Frown  Up  Down 

Message:

Enter here:
Disable smilies in this post.
Disable block tag code.
Add [url] tag at URLs.