Looking at the results it obviously comes down to which games you are playing, and plan to play, that will dictate how many cores you are going to need. As a rule of thumb we suggest all gamers look at making the transition to a quad-core processor, as we found more than half the games we tested with saw significant gains when going from two to four cores.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
« Palit & Inno3D GeForce GTX 460 · Gaming: The Core Debate
· Gigabyte X58A-UD9 »
pages 1 2
|
ProX |
Posted on: 08/11/2010 12:58 PM
@ PCMechanik - really not sure what that has to do with anything? At least to do with an article that explored the impact 1,2 and 4 cores had on performance. If you want to count the Core i5 670 as a quad core be my guest. That said HT is not nearly efficient as dedicated cores, so the Core i5 750 will be faster in games that utilize all four cores. You also have to question who would spend $300 US on a dual-core processor with Hyper-Threading? Any gamer that does when the Core i5 750 costs $200 US probably needs to have their marbles checked. The Core i5 670 also has half the L3 cache of the Core i5 750, OUCH!!! |
|
travbrad |
I've been looking all over for something like this. It's greatly appreciated. I think my E8400 will last me a bit longer with some OCing |
|
Cheewie |
Thanks! Great test |
pages 1 2








