heading
Welcome
. . ......
Latest Content
HIS Radeon HD 7950 IceQ Turbo...
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom...
QNAP TS-879 Pro (10GbE Performance...
Intel Core i7-3770K (Ivy Bridge)...
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 6...
HIS Radeon HD 7870 IceQ Turbo...
Asrock X79 Extreme4 & X79 Extreme4...
Gigabyte Radeon HD 7870 OC...
OCZ Octane 512GB
AMD Radeon HD 7870 and Radeon HD 7...
TechSpot Reviews
Diablo III Performance Test: Grap...
Testing 10 Gigabit Ethernet Perfo...
Gainward GeForce GTX 670 Phantom ...
Cubitek HPTX-ICE Case Review...
Raspberry Pi Review & Initial How...
Biggest Tech Failures of The Last...
Gainward GeForce GTX 680 Phantom ...
Cloud Storage: 5 Alternatives, Wh...
Tribes: Ascend GPU & CPU Performa...
Ivy Bridge Debuts: Intel Core i7-...
Latest News
Weekend tech reading: Facebook fr...
WOF: Windows 8 ditches Aero Glass...
Weekend Open Forum: Windows 8 dit...
Windows Phone claims 7% market sh...
Apple responds to 'deceptive ads'...
VIA unveils ultra-compact, fanles...
Weekend game deals: Deus Ex: HR $...
RIM, Motorola aim to meet Apple h...
Intel sets timeline to develop wo...
Apple fires back at Greenpeace: W...
Legion Hardware » Articles » Gaming: The Core Debate

Gaming: The Core Debate
[Posted by: Steve]
Read More
Comment
Today we are taking almost half a dozen games to see how they perform when using one, two and four cores. For this test we will be using not just an Intel Core i7 processor, but also the Core i5, Core 2 Quad and AMD Phenom II X4 processors, which will give us a good idea of just how core dependent each series is in order to deliver maximum performance...

Looking at the results it obviously comes down to which games you are playing, and plan to play, that will dictate how many cores you are going to need. As a rule of thumb we suggest all gamers look at making the transition to a quad-core processor, as we found more than half the games we tested with saw significant gains when going from two to four cores.

07/20/2010
« Palit & Inno3D GeForce GTX 460 · Gaming: The Core Debate · Gigabyte X58A-UD9 »

pages 1 2

ProX



Posted on: 08/11/2010 12:58 PM
@ PCMechanik - really not sure what that has to do with anything? At least to do with an article that explored the impact 1,2 and 4 cores had on performance. If you want to count the Core i5 670 as a quad core be my guest.

That said HT is not nearly efficient as dedicated cores, so the Core i5 750 will be faster in games that utilize all four cores.

You also have to question who would spend $300 US on a dual-core processor with Hyper-Threading? Any gamer that does when the Core i5 750 costs $200 US probably needs to have their marbles checked. The Core i5 670 also has half the L3 cache of the Core i5 750, OUCH!!!

travbrad



Posted on: 11/01/2010 04:58 AM
I've been looking all over for something like this. It's greatly appreciated. I think my E8400 will last me a bit longer with some OCing :)

Cheewie



Posted on: 12/24/2010 04:57 AM
Thanks! Great test

pages 1 2

Post New Comment

Your Name:


Icon:
Note  Alert  Question  Star  Idea  Disk  Smile  Wink  Sad  Mad  Happy 
Tongue  Sleep  Cool  Very Sad  Frown  Up  Down 

Message:

Enter here:
Disable smilies in this post.
Disable block tag code.
Add [url] tag at URLs.