When compared to the Core i7-2600K the new i7-3770K wasn’t a great deal faster for the most part. Many of our real-world application tests saw very little difference in performance, such as Excel 2010, WinRAR and Photoshop CS5. That said, there were instances where the Core i7-3770K was around 10% faster, such as Fritz Chess 13. Where we saw the biggest gains was in our encoding benchmarks, here the Core i7 3770K was between 10–17% faster than the i7-2600K.
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
« Kingston DataTraveler HyperX 3.0 64GB · Intel Core i7-3770K (Ivy Bridge)
· QNAP TS-879 Pro (10GbE Performance) »
|
Calle2003 Posts: 16 Joined: 2010-04-27 |
Posted on: 04/23/2012 09:40 PM
What kind of cooling did you use to be able to run 1.520v on an Ivy Bridge? It would be interesting to see some temperature readings as well.  |
|
ProX |
Posted on: 04/24/2012 11:22 AM
Nice update but nothing majorly new. |
|
Snoop |
Posted on: 04/24/2012 11:52 PM
I was just getting ready to upgrade from my core i5 750 system so this is prefect timing. Thanks for the review. |
|
Produkt |
Posted on: 04/28/2012 08:30 AM
Would really like to see the temps and cooling method used to sustain a 1.520v on the Ivy Bridge architecture. With such a small die size to dissipate heat, I can only imagine TERRIBLE temperatures. Reports of 90+ degrees Celsius are streaming in from mere 1.4v overclocks. I would imagine due to the parabolic temperature to voltage ratio, the core must have gotten red-hot unless cooled with liquid hydrogen/nitrogen. |
|
ServerStation668 |
Posted on: 05/17/2013 08:23 PM
With its Intel processors the Z1 by Hp has impressive benchmarks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CY5DNyEOBeU |