heading
IBM launches eight-core Power7 processor
Graphics chips to power servers in two years
3D gaming: everything you need to know
IBM demonstrates 100GHz transistor
Lithium batteries could last 20 years
ATI Radeon HD 5570
ATI Radeon HD 5450
Intel Pentium G6950 vs. AMD Phenom II X2 550
Thermalright Venomous-X
Patriot PS-100 128GB
DISCUSS REVIEW
Test System Specs
Hardware
- Intel Core 2 Extreme E6850 (3.00GHz) LGA775

- x2 Corsair DOMINATOR Twin3X2048-1800C7DF G Module(s)

- Seagate 320GB 7200-RPM (Serial ATA300)

- Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX (768MB)

- ASUS P5E3 Deluxe (Intel X38)

Software
- Microsoft Windows Vista (64bit)
- Nvidia Forceware (169.01)
- Intel System Drivers (8.4.0)

After much messing about in the very early hours of the morning, I finally worked out why the 64-bit version of Crysis would not run. For some reason in the Nvidia control panel when the V-Sync option is set to "Use the 3D application setting" and the Multi-display/mixed-GPU acceleration setting on "Multiple display performance mode" the 64-bit version would instantly lock up. Changing these settings to “Force On” and “Single display performance” allowed us to finally run the 64-bit version. The results were quite good...

As you can see the claims made by Crytek that the 64-bit version would allow for 10-15% more performance were very accurate. At 1440x900 we saw an 18% rise in performance favouring the 64-bit version while the 1680x1050 resolution also enjoyed an 18% increase in performance. There was even a 16% gain in performance at 1920x1200 which was most impressive. It would appear after all, that running Crysis in 64-bit mode when possible is very worthwhile indeed.

overclocking i7 750
Racing before Gran Turismo
NH-U12P best fan set up
Win 7 - Getting Name/Modified/...
The Third & The Seventh
ATI Radeon HD 5570 Review
ATI Radeon HD 5450 Review
TechSpot PC Buying Guide
Effortless Ways to Download Video Content from YouTube and Other Sites
ATI Radeon HD 5670 Review